Sophie Cunningham, the starlet of the league, has drawn the full ire of the LGBTQ+ community & WNBA. She said that biological males don’t belong in girls sports, and for this she’s been crucified by the WNBA & fake left DEI media. The American people aren’t buying it, and strongly support Sophie Cunningham and her right to express an opinion. It’s become a First Amendment issue on free speech for WNBA players.

This picture above is Minnesota Lynx head coach Cheryl Reeves at today’s Fever-Lynx game in Minneapolis. For context, The home crowd booed Sophie Cunningham every time she touched the ball because she publicly expressed an opinion 95% of Americans agree with. This booing was probably organized beforehand by Cheryl Reeves and her LGBTQ+ activist colleagues. Ironically, the biggest cheer of the game came when Sophie Cunningham hit a three, and all her supporters in the arena erupted, much louder than all the previous booing from her haters. That was the game going on.

Minnesota Lynx head coach Cheryl Reeves wore a shirt saying ‘trans kids belong’ on the front. It was a philistine statement. ‘Trans kids’ are figment of the warped DEI imagination because kids are too young to know. It is medically unethical to change the sex of, or start hormone therapy on a minor.

Transgender is a medical ethics issue first, meaning anyone under 18 years of age can not (in good conscience) be allowed sex change surgery or hormone/chemical therapy. It’s too dangerous on a developing body. Get mental therapy, seek support, etc. Anyone under 18 has no capacity to understand the decision they are making or its consequences because they are too young to know. It’s too young to be so sexually decisive in such a way, so think it over, and when you’re 18 you can do this if it’s what you really want. For providers, those have to be the ethics in order to protect children from becoming pawns in a sick political game.

I’d be interested to know what practicing physicians and other real world health care providers think about this. I’d also love to see some real science analyzed, short-term & long-term studies by serious researchers. Those are the voices that are being shut out of the political discussions. All their years of diligent study and public service get ignored by political elites & institutions like the WNBA when it comes to transgender health policy.

XX doesn’t equal XY. A DNA swab has to be the definitive test to determine athletic sex & bathroom designation. Anything else leads into a post-modernist wonderland. Transgender athletes competing in women’s sports is more prevalent in the NCAA, where dozens of examples now exist. A few high schools (with district, regional and state competitions) have allowed transgender boys to compete against girls, and it hasn’t been well-received by parents or the greater public.

The US working class, of all political stripes (Rep, Dem, Ind) generally accepts LGBTQ as a personal right, they just don’t want it shoved down their throats, which is what is being done for the politics I’ve outlined. Whenever I read “socialist, left, communist,” etc, with a negative bias in a comments section, I understand that as working class confusion sowed by the fake left.

The issue of transgender participation in girl’s/women’s athletics is a political hot-button, as is their access to female public restrooms. It’s imperative to have the correct perspective here. It comes down to medical science, which is being blurred all over the place with quackery & right-wing, as well as fake left narratives.

Democrats are the ones promoting this transgender issue through its LGBTQ+ axis. This is what Marxists correctly define as the fake left. Its purpose is to fuel the stronger eventual conservative push back to the right. No one in the Democratic Party really pushes for this transgender sports nonsense, but they let their liberal flak organs pump out this fake news line and the LGBTQ+ community eats it up. For this, they always vote Democrat in November.

Bourgeois polls reveal 75% of Americans believe biological males should not be allowed to compete in female sports in public schools. I’ve never met anyone who supported this, so I believe that number is actually closer to 95-99%, with the official numbers kept lower for political reasons. As Marxists, we don’t feed into far-right prejudice, but we also don’t cater to fake left identity politics. Playing sports is a social right, but it is also a merit-based activity founded on ability & interest. I sense a lot of unhealthy enabling here, which is a DEI hallmark.

Changing sex is a personal choice that demands accountability & accepting the challenges it presents. Doing this before adulthood is highly questionable, as that person is still a minor and therefore not able to make adult decisions for themselves. It’s not legal to drink alcohol or consume tobacco products until you are at least age 18, so it makes sense to many people that changing gender should be included in that. These are things you shouldn’t do to your body, until you are an adult– if at all.

The WNBA prattles on & on about inclusion, then works to cancel anyone who disagrees with their DEI narratives. Transgender people have rights, they just don’t have special rights, such as being allowed access to girls bathrooms & locker rooms. They can compete with those of the same athletic sex, and use bathrooms designated by their biologic sex–XX or XY. This only became a confused issue when cynical snowflakes insisted upon special rights for themselves.

To be clear, Cheryl Reeves supports gender affirming mutilation of children’s bodies. That’s what ‘trans kids belong’ means. For this she is portrayed as “thoughtful” in the fake left media. Apparently, the WNBA is too ignorant to even notice, much less object to this unethical message. Sophie Cunningham only stated that she wanted to keep girls safe in sports locker rooms and the WNBA came after her with DEI hate.

——-

According to Google AI, 38% of WNBA are openly lesbian. I think that number is actually closer to two-thirds. There are a few pretty girls in the WNBA, but I notice they are mostly on the bench. I wonder how many of these pretty girls are straight and if they appreciate how they are being used? That’s a fucking question.

Sophie Cunningham is a pretty girl who actually gets to play and helps her team win. Sophie Cunningham is straight & white, while the WNBA is lesbian & black. The L’s are upset that Sophie Cunningham & Caitlin Clark get so much attention & money. Sexual politics is the name of the game in the WNBA. It’s also the race card the WNBA played when it hyped Caitlin Clark as their great white hope. No one deserves that designation. It’s an impossible situation to be in where you can’t please anyone. It made the WNBA lots of money, while dividing so many players & fans.

Caitlin Clark is the best pure shooter the WNBA has ever seen, but she still has a ways to go before she’s a great player. You have to help your team win for that. The Indiana Fever are WNBA title contenders, but I see them coming up short because they give away too many easy baskets. Championship teams don’t do that. Caitlin Clark needs to improve her left hand and defensive skill set for the Indiana Fever to win a WNBA title.

The DEI politics in this league make scouting and analyzing play something completely different. You need to account for a pretty straight girl who barely plays effectively, namely Sophie Cunningham. She gets all the lesbians attention on the court, and it helps the Indiana Fever. You don’t see that sexual effect in the NBA, I guess that’s why I find it noteworthy. It’s tough to measure, or even discern, but it’s there and Sophie Cunningham knows it.

The Fever almost won a game today where they were hopelessly beaten down for the first three-plus quarters on the road. The Minnesota Lynx have the best record in the league, so I definitely saw this game as a challenge, and the Fever were nearly good enough to win, while not even playing well.

Sophie Cunningham neutralizes at least one good lesbian defender on every possession. If I was a L, I’d be denying her the ball too. The L’s don’t want Sophie Cunningham getting any good press at their expense. As a consequence, that opens up the floor for Kelsey Mitchell, Caitlin Clark, etc. Those two need to find Cunningham more in drive-and-draw kickouts. Make those lesbians pay for sagging off Sophie Cunningham to help in the paint. I think that might be a winning strategy for the Indiana Fever.

If you leave Sophie Cunningham alone, she makes the 3. Her defense is spotty (she’s too upright, running & in a stance), but she displays effort & grit, with just enough awareness. She needs to be in the game more. Sophie Cunningham will body-up & not foul on a bigger player with the ball in the paint. All this from the straight starlet of the lesbian league. The lesbians on the Fever play harder when Sophie Cunningham is on the court, so it works both ways, where the opposing lesbians are boxed-in by their frustration of not being able to see Sophie Cunningham shower after the game.

That is fair & not fair, love & war, in the form of Sophie Cunningham. The rest of Sophie Cunningham’s teammates need to defend better, take care of the ball better, and make their lay-ups. But then again I could say that about every WNBA team. I watch the WNBA as sports, political theater & bad girl comedy. I wrote this scouting report from a sexist viewpoint, because that’s what the WNBA has become.

——

Screening is a lost art in basketball. Sophie Cunningham has revolutionized screening in the WNBA. Pretty girls, watch & learn. Sophie Cunningham sets a lot of screens and multiple defenders seem to cling to her without violent contact. It’s fascinating to watch, over & over. The Fever dribbler generally gets around the corner with lots of space and good things happen when Sophie Cunningham sets a screen in the WNBA.

On defense, Sophie Cunningham uses her same assets. Any weak side lesbian shooter is her responsibility and is generally neutralized. She denies while making them weak in the knees. They want to be near her without the ball. Sophie Cunningham never gets beat back door as opposing players with a step seem slow down & signal her when they are supposedly trying to sneak by unnoticed. I’ve seen that a lot. Sophie Cunningham’s lack of elite court awareness is often camouflaged by lesbian vanity & desire. Sophie Cunningham isn’t Scottie Pippen, but she’s elite effective defensively in her own WNBA style. WNBA scouting reports are different because of this.

—–

It’s been said the WNBA is a circus. These sexual games define the WNBA. Pretty power v lesbian power, black v white, etc. There is so much rigged DEI politics, out front & behind the scenes. The Democrats think the WNBA is helping them, when in fact it is discrediting them. Sex has become so weaponized that WNBA coaches should now employ this above-discussed ‘pretty girl strategy’ because it is effective. It’s a lesbian neutralizer. I’ve never seen anything like it in sports.

It’s like when you (as a straight guy) go to a party and you see your friends there, and a few others, but nothing of interest. The LGBTQ’s just don’t do it for you. Sometimes you need a pretty girl (or two) to walk into the room and everything changes for the better. I can’t say what it is, but that’s what I’ve noticed throughout life. DEI activists claim they don’t understand this and that everyone is equal in beauty, etc. Unfortunately that doesn’t work in practice. In the real world, beauty matters & it commands. When the numbers favor lesbians, a pretty straight girl becomes their kryptonite. Everyone has their kryptonite, and that’s the ‘Sophie Cunningham effect’ in the WNBA.

——-

I’ve played against the pretty girl who can ball, so I know the Sophie Cunningham effect. When Sophie Cunningham screens me, I’m stopping in front of her and asking her if she wants to get a drink after the game, etc. She’ll wink and laugh and then jog down to the other end after her team scores. I’ll follow her, expecting an answer, not remembering if I’m on offense or defense, etc. I have the skills to blow by her any time I get the ball, but I don’t want to. When she gets the ball, I let her shoot, because I wouldn’t want to do anything that would upset her, such as blocking her shot or stealing the ball from her. What are you going to do when the pretty girl matches up with you? Over & Out

……..<><><><><>……….